Coverage, without assumptions.

Technical observations and legal interpretations have different evidence requirements.

No legal packs are active.

US federal, California, Texas, and UK topics are candidates only. Qualified source review and approval are required before any jurisdiction-specific legal finding can be issued. EU coverage and other states are not implied.

Check category	Implemented approach	Evidence boundary
Site inventory	Bounded page crawl, links, placeholders, HTTP results	Only sampled pages and discovered links
Accessibility	axe-core automated rules and manual review items	Automated passes do not establish conformance
Tracking & consent	Four isolated scenarios; storage names and third-party hosts	Purpose and legal consent requirements remain uncertain
Security	HTTPS and response-header observations	Presence does not prove protection; no exploitation
Privacy & data	Forms, notice links and business facts	Full data inventory and notice adequacy need review
Subscriptions	Public wording and attributed owner answers	No checkout, purchase or private cancellation tests
Marketing claims	Known placeholder patterns	No assertion that reviews are fake or claims unlawful
Privacy requests	Public contact paths and manual operational review	No proof of request fulfillment or deletion
AI features	Explicit deployed-product fact collection	Builder AI use does not imply runtime AI processing

How to read a result

pass

The specific tested condition was satisfied within the recorded scope.

fail

Evidence establishes a technical test failure.

partial

Only some required conditions were established.

unknown

Material facts or evidence are missing.

manual review

Human judgment or operational evidence is needed.

error

Execution failed. This is not a clean result.

not applicable

A stated applicability decision excludes the control.

fixed unverified

A change was reported but has not been verified.